Claude and ChatGPT can both write, summarise, analyse documents and power a customer assistant; the right choice depends on your use cases, the business plan you pick and the tools you need to connect. Compare them on twenty or so of your real cases and check what each provider does with your data. Then start with a repetitive internal task, reviewed by a person, rather than direct conversations with your customers.
In many businesses, the question comes from the ground up: an employee is already using an assistant to rephrase an email or summarise a tender, often on a personal account. Management wants to set some ground rules, and wonders which one to choose.
Claude, from Anthropic, and ChatGPT, from OpenAI, are mentioned here as tools, with no partnership with either company. Both evolve quickly: rather than a ranking that will soon be out of date, here are criteria that hold from one version to the next.
Which tasks should you compare them on?
Yours. General benchmarks measure average capabilities; you need to know which one writes in your tone, summarises your documents without making anything up and follows your instructions. Put together a small test bench:
- Writing: a few real, anonymised customer emails, a sales proposal, a LinkedIn post.
- Document analysis: a contract, a specification, a long report, with questions you already know the answers to.
- Customer assistant: your frequently asked questions, including a few trick ones that fall outside your offer.
- Data: a spreadsheet export to summarise or reformat.
What happens to your data, depending on the plan?
This is the criterion you can’t fix after the fact. Anthropic states that, by default, data from its commercial offerings (Team and Enterprise plans, API) is not used to train its models, unless you submit feedback or give explicit permission, and that admins on a Team plan can turn that feedback off. OpenAI, for its part, states that data sent to its API is not used for training unless you explicitly opt in.
For ChatGPT’s team plans, read the current terms on OpenAI’s own pages before choosing: we don’t summarise them here. In every case, ban free personal accounts for company data, and apply the principles set out in the AI guidance of the CNIL, France’s data protection authority: a clear purpose, the minimum of data, and informing the people concerned.
Demo: an illustrated screen, with no prices, names or real clients.
Chat interface or API integration?
These are two separate uses. The chat interface, on a business subscription, serves employees day to day: writing, summarising, thinking things through. The API lets you plug the model into your own tools: a form that sorts incoming requests, an assistant on your website, automated document processing.
For an integration, the comparison is less about the model than about everything around it: integration with your software, control over usage-based costs, a log of exchanges. Plan an architecture that lets you switch from one model to another without starting over: you’re no longer dependent on a single provider.
What should you connect first?
An internal, repetitive task whose output is reviewed before it’s used. For example: summarising each incoming request and suggesting a category, drafting a first response to a tender from your past bids, extracting the details of a purchase order into a spreadsheet.
This first project teaches the team to write instructions, spot errors and measure the time saved, without exposing your customers. To find these tasks in your week, see our article on automating your business.
What’s best left unconnected at first
Some uses aren’t ruled out in principle, but they need a framework (informing people, human review, logging) that rarely gets put in place in the first month:
- an assistant that answers customers on its own, with no review and no hand-off to a person;
- anything that commits the business: quotes, contractual terms, responses to a dispute;
- health data, personnel files and highly sensitive information;
- decisions that affect people, such as screening job applications.
Can you use both?
You can, and sometimes it makes sense: one tool for employees’ everyday use, the other for a specific integration where it proved more reliable in your tests. You’ll then have two subscriptions and two sets of usage rules to keep up to date.
For an SME, starting with a single, well-governed tool is often simpler. Our AI integration team runs these tests with you and sets up the first integration, then our automation and custom tools service connects the rest. Our team works from Rhône-Alpes, remotely or on site (our articles for the Lyon area (in French)).
- Compare the two tools on your own tasks, scored blind.
- Check the data policy of the plan you choose; ban free personal accounts.
- The interface serves employees, the API serves integrations into your tools.
- Start with a repetitive internal task, reviewed by a person.
- Save direct conversations with customers for a second stage, with written rules.
Frequently asked questions
Do employees need an AI usage policy?
Yes, short and practical: approved tools, which accounts to use, data that’s off limits, mandatory review of anything that goes out to a customer. One page is enough if everyone knows it.
Can the answers be wrong?
Yes: both tools can produce inaccurate information in a very confident tone. Hence two rules: a person reviews anything that commits the business, and the tool is asked to point to the passage in the document it relies on.
How much does setting it up cost?
Subscription prices are published by the providers and change often. The set-up (tests, instructions, integration, team training) is quoted individually, depending on the scope.
Can I query AI about my technical documentation?
Yes, it’s one of the most useful applications, with a business plan and answers that cite their sources. We set out the method in an AI assistant connected to your technical documentation (in French).
We test Claude and ChatGPT on your own documents, write your usage policy and set up a first useful integration. Let’s talk it through on a first call.
- Anthropic, Is my data used for model training? (commercial offerings)
- OpenAI, Your data on the API platform
- CNIL, Practical guidance sheets on AI (in French)
- European Commission, Transparency obligations under Article 50 of the AI Act (FAQ)
Pages accessed on 13 October 2026. The brands mentioned belong to their owners.
